Legal Opinion
Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Norfolk & Dedham Group
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided April 5, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.
The plaintiff, Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. (“Barron”), provided chiropractic treatment to its patient, Nicole Jean Pierre, for injuries arising out of a motor vehicle accident in which the patient was an occupant of a vehicle insured by the defendant, Norfolk & Dedham Group (“Norfolk & Dedham”). Barron alleges that it is an “unpaid party” under G.L.c. 90, §34M because Norfolk & Dedham has failed to pay its reasonable charges for that treatment under the personal injury protection (“PIP”) coverage of the standard Massachusetts automobile policy.
Norfolk & Dedham had an…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- National Ass'n of Government Employees, Inc. v. Central Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- City of Boston v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Goes v. FeldmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Flax Pond Chiropractic Care v. Quincy Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014
- Lomibo, LLC v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014