Legal Opinion
Hershenow v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 17, 2006PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Marshall, CJ.
We consider in this case whether two consumers who rented motor vehicles from the defendants, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Boston, Inc., and Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company (collectively Enterprise), have stated a claim under G. L. c. 93A, § 9 (1), which permits an action by any person who has been “injured” by another’s unfair or deceptive act or practice. The rental customers contend that the collision damage waiver provision (CDW) in Enterprise’s form rental contract violated G. L. c. 93A, because its terms failed to comply with the requirements of G. L. c. 90, § 32E ½,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Sullivan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Ruiz v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- A.G. Ex Rel. Maddox v. Elsevier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Young v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Shaulis v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.