Legal Opinion

Fascione v. CNA Insurance Companies

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 6, 2001PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

This appeal presents a question of statutory interpretation: whether, under G. L. c. 90, § 34M, an insurer is liable to an insured for interest, costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees when the insurer pays the insured’s personal injury protection benefits in full, but does so after the thirty-day deadline and after the insured files a complaint to recover such benefits. We conclude that the insurer is not so liable.

1. Background. Antonette Fascione sustained injuries during *89an automobile accident and, as a result, incurred medical expenses. At the time of the accident, she had been driving a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Beeler v. DowneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. General Electric Co. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Hopkins v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Auto Flat Car Crushers, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Norfolk & Dedham GroupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. DiGiacomo v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  4. Shepard v. Harleysville Worcester InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. Ortiz v. Examworks, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API