Hartunian v. Pilgrim Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, J.
Byron V. Hartunian, M.D., P.C. (“Hartunian”) commenced this action against Pilgrim Insurance Company (“Pilgrim”) for breach of contract to recover unpaid personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits under G.L.c. 90, §34M and for violations of G.L.C. 93A, §11, all arising from medical services provided to Patricia Henderson-Sneed (“Sneed”). After a jury-waived trial, the judge found for Pilgrim on the PIP claim and for Hartunian on the G.L.c. 93A claim.1 Pilgrim has appealed the G.L.c. 93A judgment.
In reaching his decision, the judge made the following findings of fact. On April 24, 2007, Sneed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Dodd v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Kohl v. Silver Lake Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Norfolk & Dedham GroupMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
- Emerson Hospital v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014