State v. Baker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
The state appeals from an order suppressing evidence. ORS 138.060(3). The trial court concluded that, in the totality of the circumstances, a police officer’s remark to defendant, “So Craig, did you buy any good crack in there?” effected a stop. We disagree, and, consequently, reverse and remand.
The material facts, as found by the trial court, are undisputed. Shortly before noon on June 8, 1996, Portland Police Officer Zylawy was on patrol. He saw defendant, a known drug user with whom he had talked many times, coming out of the front door of a known “crack house.” Thinking that defendant may…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. FikesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. TerhearCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pratt v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. Morfin-EstradaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. KuehneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. LeviasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.