Legal Opinion
State v. Riggs
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 11, 1996No. 94-10-36709; CA A88530PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant appeals from convictions for manufacture, delivery and possession of a controlled substance (marijuana). ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds. We affirm.
On September 14, 1994, pursuant to a warrant, police searched a residence with which defendant was associated, discovering two pounds of marijuana in baggies and about 100 plants. The next day, police seized defendant’s pick-up truck under a state civil forfeiture statute allowing confiscation of property that is used in, intended for use in, or obtained from certain illegal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. VoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. TosteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Church at 295 S. 18th St., St. Helens v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.