Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 2008No. 061136733; A135078PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of cocaine, ORS 475.884, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence. We agree with defendant that the evidence obtained was the product of exploitation of an unlawful seizure of defendant in violation of her rights under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress, and reverse and remand.

The trial court made extensive oral findings on the record. Consistently with those findings, the following…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. Morfin-EstradaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. KuehneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. WienerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API