Legal Opinion
State v. Terhear
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 31, 1996No. 94-06-33814, 94-06-33815 CA A86125 (Control), CA A86126PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
The state appeals from a pretrial order granting defendants’ motions to suppress evidence. ORS 138.060(3). We affirm with respect to defendant Goemmel, and remand for further findings as to defendant Terhear.
On the afternoon of June 10, 1994, Portland Police Officer Andrew was on foot patrol in the Old Town district. Andrew saw defendant Goemmel ride by in the front passenger seat of a two-door car and noticed that Goemmel was not wearing a safety belt, in violation of ORS 811.210(1)(c). A few minutes later, Andrew and his partner, Marshall, saw the same car parked in a truck loading zone and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. Morfin-EstradaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.