Winegar v. Martin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
From an order of the district court for Waseca county changing the venue of the action from Waseca county to Hennepin county, plaintiff appealed. Respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order was not appealable.
1Opinion of the Court
Per 'Curiam.
The appeal is from an order changing the place of trial from the county of Waseca to that of Hennepin. Respondent moves to dismiss on the ground that the order is not appealable. Appellant resists the motion, citing Chadbourne v. Reed, 83 Minn. 447, 86 N. W. 415, also Scott v. Miller Liquor Co. 122 Minn. 377, 142 N. W. 817, and Peterson v. Carlson, 127 Minn. 324, 149 N. W. 536. In each of these cases the motion was to strike from the calendar on the ground that there had in fact been a removal of the case by the filing of the demand and affidavits under section 7722, G. S. 1913.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chadbourne v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State ex rel. D. S. B. Johnston Land Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Delasca v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State ex rel. Ballord-Trimble Lumber Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- State ex rel. Johnson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Security State Bank v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Swanson v. AlworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Agricultural Insurance v. Midwest Technical Development Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State ex rel. Hilton v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State ex rel. Winegar v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.