Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hilton v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1924No. 24,032PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

On January 7, 1924, the attorney general brought an action on behalf of the state in the district court of Ramsey county against the Crete Mining Company, a Minnesota corporation, to collect the *283so-called occupation tax claimed to be due from that company for iron ore mined by it in the year 1921. On January 8, 1924, the defendant duly served and filed an affidavit that its principal and only place of business was in the county of St. Louis with a written demand that the action be tried in that county. Thereupon the attorney general procured an order from the district court of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hurning v. HurningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. State ex rel. Security State Bank v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Delasca v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Swanson v. AlworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Swanson v. AlworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Agricultural Insurance v. Midwest Technical Development Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Nesseth v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API