Chadbourne v. Reed
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbe district court for Ramsey county; Jaggard, J., striking tbe cause from tbe calendar on the ground that the same had been removed to Anoka county.
1Opinion of the Court
START, O. X
This is an action for conversion of certain logs, and was commenced in the district court of the county of Ramsey. The summons was not served on the defendant Lathrop E. Reed, but it was served upon each of the other defendants, one of whom then resided in the county of Anoka, and the other in the county of Ramsey. They appeared by the same attorneys, and in due time they united in a demand that the place of trial of the action be changed to the county of Anoka. Upon filing this demand, with proof of its service, together with an affidavit showing the residence of the defendants,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McMurphy v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Lee v. BuckheitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Lovejoy v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Horicon Shooting Club v. GorslineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ginsberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Jemming v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Donovan v. DixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- In Re Estate of FirleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.