State ex rel. Winegar v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal reported in 148 Minn. 489, 182 N. W. 613, and upon the relation of Frank Winegar, the supreme court granted its alternative writ of mandamus directed to the district court for Waseca county and the Honorable Arthur R. Childress, judge thereof, to review the order of that court changing the venue of the case.
1Per curiam
Procedure tó procure a writ of mandamus directing the district court of Waseca county to retain the action hereinafter referred to in that county for trial.
In October, 1920, Frank Winegar brought an action based upon contract in the district court of Waseca county, against J. E. Martin, Mike Stopa and three other persons as defendants. Martin resided in Hennepin county and the other defendants in Waseca county. Martin and Stopa answered separately. The other defendants did not answer, nor does it appear that they were served.
*497Upon the call of the calendar at the opening of the regular January,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Winegar v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3Cited by2 opinions
- Swanson v. AlworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- State ex rel. Hilton v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924