Legal Opinion
Haight v. Viking Pump Co. of Delaware
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 11, 1939No. 132PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, District Judge.
This is a suit for infringement of patent. Defendant, appearing specially, moves to quash and set aside the return of the summons, and to dismiss the action for want of jurisdiction. Defendant contends that at the time of the service of the summons, it had no regular and established place of business within the Eastern Judicial District of Wisconsin.
Plaintiff formerly represented the defendant in Wisconsin, and in 1937 was succeeded by one Clark F. Mullens, upon whom the summons was served.
The defendant company pays the rent of the office used by Mr. Mullens, who…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Phillips v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Brevel Products Corp. v. H & B AMERICAN CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- McGah v. VM CORPORATIONDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
- Clayton v. Swift & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1955
- Kaffenberger v. KremerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.