Legal Opinion

McGah v. VM CORPORATION

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 8, 1958No. 58 C 383PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, District Judge.

This is an action for an alleged patent infringement. One of the defendants, V-M Corporation, has moved to dismiss the action on the following grounds: (1) the court has no jurisdiction over V-M, and (2) venue is improper. In support of the motion, V-M has filed two affidavits and two contracts. In opposition to the motion, plaintiff relies upon the same documents and upon certain listings in the Chicago classified telephone directory. Also in the file of this case is a deposition of the president of Newark Electric Company.

V-M is a Michigan corporation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Fennell v. BacheSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Phillips v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Grantham v. Challenge-Cook Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  2. Freedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. Brevel Products Corp. v. H & B AMERICAN CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Altman v. LIBERTY EQUITIES CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API