International Harvester Co. of America v. Kentucky
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. The facts, which involve the validity and sufficiency of service of process upon a foreign corporation and the determination of whether such corporation was doing business within the State, are stated in the opinion. For cases involving questions of service of process upon foreign corporations as controlled by the Constitution of the United States, see Ky. Stats., § 571 (1909); Commonwealth v. Hogan & Co., 25 Ky.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. The facts, which involve the validity and sufficiency of service of process upon a foreign corporation and the determination of whether such corporation was doing business within the State, are stated in the opinion. For cases involving questions of service of process upon foreign corporations as controlled by the Constitution of the United States, see Ky. Stats., § 571 (1909); Commonwealth v. Hogan & Co., 25 Ky. L. R. 41; Commonwealth v. Eclipse Hay Press Co., 31 Ky., L. R. 824; Three States Buggy Co. v. Commonwealth, 32 Ky. L. R. 385;…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This case presents the question of the sufficiency of the service of process on an alleged agent of the International Harvester Company in a criminal proceeding in Breckenridge County, Kentucky, in the court of which county an indictment had been returned against the Harvester Company for alleged violation of the anti-trust laws of the State of Kentucky. The Harvester Company appeared and moved to quash the return, substantially, upon the ground that service had not been made upon an authorized agent of'the company and that the company was not doing business within the State of Kentucky, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by478 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
473 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.