Legal Opinion

Van Ness v. Eckerd Corp.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 2002No. 3531PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, C.J.:

William Van Ness appeals from two orders issued by two different circuit court judges. First, he appeals an order setting aside an entry of default against Eckerd Corporation. Secondly, he appeals from an earlier order in which the circuit court judge sua sponte vacated his prior order denying Eckerd relief from entry of default. He contends there was no good cause shown to set aside the entry of default or, in the alternative, that the first circuit judge should not have vacated his order. We vacate both the order setting aside the entry of default and the decision vacating the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Lafaye v. TimmermanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Bunkum v. Manor PropertiesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Pitman v. Republic Leasing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Doran v. DoranSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re BeardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Stoneledge at Lake Keowee Owners' Ass'n v. Builders FirstSource-Southeast GroupCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  3. Matthews v. Richland County School District OneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Stoneledge at Lake Keowee Owners' Ass'n v. Clear View Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Watkins v. Newsome Management Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API