Legal Opinion

Lafaye v. Timmerman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1998No. 2867PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Chief Judge:

Ingrid Zimmer Timmerman filed a petition claiming she was entitled to a share of her husband’s, the Honorable George Bell Timmerman’s, estate because she qualified as an omitted spouse from a will that Timmerman executed before their marriage. The probate court held Ingrid did not qualify to receive a share of the estate as an omitted spouse, but allowed her to claim an elective share of the estate. Both Ingrid and Cary Dupre Lafaye, a beneficiary under Timmerman’s will, appealed the probate court’s decision to the circuit court. The circuit court agreed with the probate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pelican Building Centers of Horry-Georgetown, Inc. v. DuttonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Matter of HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Hendrix v. Eastern Distribution, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Godfrey v. HellerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wogan Ex Rel. Estate of Wogan v. KunzeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. In Re Estate of CumbeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Watson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Turpin v. LowtherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  5. Van Ness v. Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API