Bunkum v. Manor Properties
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Appellant, Marie Bunkum, commenced this action pursuant to Rule 60(b), SCRCP, seeking to have a “Supplemental Order of Judgment of [sic] Costs” entered on October 7, 1993 by the Charleston County Master-in-Equity declared void because it was not statutorily authorized. She simultaneously moved pursuant to Rule 65(b), SCRCP, for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction to enjoin the impending sale of her residence. The trial judge entered a TRO preventing the sale of Bunkum’s property, but after conducting a hearing one week later, issued an order dissolving the TRO,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Muller v. Myrtle Beach Golf & Yacht ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Smith Companies of Greenville, Inc. v. HayesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- State v. GorieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- DeWitt v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Eldridge v. City of GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. M & T Enterprises of Mt. Pleasant, LLC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Lake v. Reeder Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Van Ness v. Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Deep Keel, LLC v. Atlantic Private Equity Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.