Legal Opinion
Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. Hitchcock
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 1, 2000No. 25099PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The attached opinion is substituted for the opinion previously filed in this matter on March 27, 2000.
/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J. FOR THE COURT TOAL, Acting Chief Justice:
R.L. Hitchcock (“Hitchcock”) appeals the Court of Appeals’ decision to adopt a breach of an express warranty to obtain a specific result as a new common law cause of action against attorneys in South Carolina. We reverse the Court of Appeals.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1991, George Hart and Ann Law, who are both citizens of the United Kingdom domiciled in Scotland, consulted with the law firm Brock & Hitchcock about…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Tommy L. Griffin Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Smith v. HaynsworthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- BEACHWALK VILLAS COND. ASSOC. INC. v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Allen v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Epstein v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Lucas v. RAWL FAMILY LTD. PARTNERSHIPSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.