Pitman v. Republic Leasing Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEARN, C.J.:
David and Beverly Pitman appeal the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to Republic Leasing Company under the Frivolous Proceedings Sanctions Act (the Act), claiming the trial judge lacked jurisdiction and abused his discretion. We vacate.
FACTS
David and Beverly Pitman filed suit against Republic Leasing for violation of the Payment of Wages Act, S.C.Code Ann. § 41-10-10 (Supp.2000), and breach of contract to recover allegedly unpaid vacation time, incentive pay, moving expenses, and bonus pay. Republic Leasing answered, denying that the Pitmans were their employees.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hanahan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. BestSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Leviner v. Sonoco Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Center v. CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Russell v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Holmes v. East Cooper Community Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Van Ness v. Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Rutland v. Holler, Dennis, Corbett, Ormond & GarnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- In Re BeardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.