Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Newsome Management Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 24, 2004No. 3800PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, J.:

Attorney T. Alexander Beard appeals an order of the trial court denying his motion for sanctions brought under the Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanctions Act (“the FCPSA”), S.C.Code Ann. § 15-36-10, et seq. (Supp. 2003) and Rule 11, SCRCP. The trial court found that Beard’s motion was time barred under the FCPSA and that the court had no jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. Alternatively, the trial court allowed the motion under Rule 11 and found that the actions at issue were done in good faith and did not constitute sanctionable behavior. We affirm.

FACTS

The initial dispute…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Hanahan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Patterson v. ReidCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Earle v. OwingsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  5. Barr v. City of Rock HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BeardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API