LaSalle Bank, National Ass'n v. Bialobrzeski
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The pro se defendant Paul S. Bialobrzeski 1 appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered in favor of the plaintiff, LaSalle Bank, National Association, as trustee for WMABS Series 2006-HE2 Trust. 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that it was improper for the trial court to deny his motion to dismiss the action because the plaintiff lacked standing. Because the record is devoid of a factual finding as to when the plaintiff acquired the note, we are unable to review the claim as to the court’s subject matter jurisdiction. See Practice Book §§ 60-5 and 61-10. We,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. FequiereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Seymour v. Region One Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Cross v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- LaSALLE BANK, NAT. ASS'N v. BialobrzeskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Peruta v. Commissioner of Public SafetyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Bozelko v. MiliciConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Park National Bank v. 3333 Main, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Sethi v. YagildereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012