Legal Opinion

LaSalle Bank, National Ass'n v. Bialobrzeski

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 21, 2010No. 29884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

The pro se defendant Paul S. Bialobrzeski 1 appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered in favor of the plaintiff, LaSalle Bank, National Association, as trustee for WMABS Series 2006-HE2 Trust. 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that it was improper for the trial court to deny his motion to dismiss the action because the plaintiff lacked standing. Because the record is devoid of a factual finding as to when the plaintiff acquired the note, we are unable to review the claim as to the court’s subject matter jurisdiction. See Practice Book §§ 60-5 and 61-10. We,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Chase Home Finance, LLC v. FequiereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Seymour v. Region One Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Cross v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. LaSALLE BANK, NAT. ASS'N v. BialobrzeskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Peruta v. Commissioner of Public SafetyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Bozelko v. MiliciConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Park National Bank v. 3333 Main, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Sethi v. YagildereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API