Legal Opinion
Seymour v. Region One Board of Education
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 14, 2005No. SC 17184PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
This case returns to us for a second time. The named plaintiff, Gabriel Seymour, among others,1 commenced this declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of General Statutes § 10-51 (b),2 which establishes the formula by which the state’s seventeen regional school districts allocate costs among their member towns. After the trial court, Cremins, J., dismissed the action on the ground that it presented a nonjusticiable political question and rendered judgment thereon, the plaintiff appealed. We reversed the trial *95court’s judgment. Seymour v. Region One Board…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Sadloski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Seymour v. Region One Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cogswell v. American Transit InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Cambodian Buddhist Society of Connecticut, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. StrongConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- West Farms Mall, LLC v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.