Peruta v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The plaintiff, Edward A. Peruta, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that (1) he had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and (2) the administrative remedies available to him were not inadequate and futile. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following facts and procedural history relevant to our discussion. The plaintiff travels throughout the state and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PMG Land Associates, L.P. v. Harbour Landing Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Burgess v. Town of WallingfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Hernandez v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012