Cross v. Hudon
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff claims that the trial court (1) failed to conduct an evidentiary hearing *731to determine if it had subject matter jurisdiction, and (2) improperly dismissed the action upon its finding that a guardian may not institute a legal action against her ward. Because we conclude that, under the facts of this case, the trial court should have conducted an eviden-tiary hearing, we need not reach the plaintiffs second issue. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment.
Th…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Roberts v. RobertsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Rummel v. RummelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. WaltonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.