Sethi v. Yagildere

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The plaintiff, Rajiv Sethi, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Bruhan Yagildere. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that he lacked standing to allege unjust enrichment and a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practice Act (CUTPA).1 We conclude that, although the trial court correctly determined that the plaintiff lacked standing, it was incorrect to render summary judgment *769in the absence of subject matter jurisdiction.2 Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and…