Legal Opinion

Bozelko v. Milici

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 11, 2012No. AC 34173PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*537 Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Ronald Bozelko, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of the defendant, Michael Milici, to dismiss the plaintiffs petition for a new trial for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts, as found by the trial court, and procedural history are relevant. In 2006, the plaintiff commenced an underlying action entitled Bozelko v. D’Albero, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. CV-06-5009158, against, inter alia, the defendant.1 In July, 2008, the defendant filed a motion for summary…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Wilcox v. Webster Insurance, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Jewett v. JewettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Leonard v. BailwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. Mall v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. R.S. Silver Enterprises, Inc. v. PascarellaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API