Pearson v. Gullans
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered October 4, 1913, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for rescission of a trade of lands, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This action was begun by plaintiffs, praying for the cancellation of a deed to property conveyed by the plaintiffs to the defendants in exchange for three hundred and sixty acres of land in the state of Michigan, deeded by defendants to plaintiffs. The transaction took place in the month of February, 1912. Plaintiffs went upon the land on the second day of May and again on the second day of July. They had not seen the land at the time of the ex-' change, and now contend that the facts with reference to it were fraudulently represented and concealed by the defendants. At the time of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BuddressWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Thomas v. McCueWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Angel v. Columbia Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Hall v. Northwest Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Edwards v. BrockwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kiewit-Grice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Darnell v. NoelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Algee v. Hillman Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Blake v. MerrittWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Stubbe v. StanglerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.