Legal Opinion

State v. Buddress

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1911No. 9134PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Jefferson county, Still, J., entered June IS, 1910, adjudging the defendants guilty of contempt of court.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

On the 6th day of June, 1910, an order was made by the superior court of Jefferson county and filed on June IS following, summarily adjudging the defendants guilty of contempt. The defendant Buddress has appealed.

The order, omitting title, signature, and the attestation of the clerk, is as follows:

“This cause coming on to be heard summarily in contempt proceedings herein and the defendants above named, and each of them, being personally present in above court;
“And whereas an action was pending in the above entitled court, entitled Elston Cromwell versus Samuel Irwin, in which Elston Cromwell…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. In Re NeagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  4. Overend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Batchelder v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. HobbleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Angel v. Columbia Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API