Westling v. City of St. Louis Park
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
Plaintiffs seek a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to order a settled case (41,091). Defendants and intervenors resist the petition and in addition move to dismiss plaintiffs’ appeals from two orders denying a new trial (40,973).
These proceedings arise out of an action seeking a declaratory judgment compelling the city of St. Louis Park to issue plaintiffs a permit to erect an apartment building in an area zoned for single-family dwellings only. It is the contention of plaintiffs that because the property in question is low and swampy the expense of preparing the soil…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Elton v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Ostrand v. Village of North St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Filister v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Doyle v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rieman v. JoubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Westling v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Rieman v. JoubertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- TRI-STATE INS. CO. OF MINN. v. BontjesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.