Legal Opinion

Westling v. City of St. Louis Park

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 1, 1968No. 40973, 41091PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Plaintiffs seek a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to order a settled case (41,091). Defendants and intervenors resist the petition and in addition move to dismiss plaintiffs’ appeals from two orders denying a new trial (40,973).

These proceedings arise out of an action seeking a declaratory judgment compelling the city of St. Louis Park to issue plaintiffs a permit to erect an apartment building in an area zoned for single-family dwellings only. It is the contention of plaintiffs that because the property in question is low and swampy the expense of preparing the soil…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Elton v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Ostrand v. Village of North St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Filister v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Doyle v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rieman v. JoubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Westling v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Rieman v. JoubertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. TRI-STATE INS. CO. OF MINN. v. BontjesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API