Legal Opinion

Rieman v. Joubert

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 12, 1985No. C3-84-1412PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

FACTS

Respondent William Rieman commenced an action against appellant Jarrel Joubert for breach of an oral contract in which Joubert agreed to pay Rieman $5,000 for his interest in a corporation jointly owned by the parties. On August 30, 1983, the trial court ordered Joubert to pay Rieman $5,000 together with interest from December 1, 1978. Joubert appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. Judgment was entered on September 20, 1983, in the sum of $6,487.43.

*911Joubert then made a motion for amended findings of fact and conclusions of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Pamida, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Tompkins v. SandeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. O'BRIEN v. WendtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Davidner v. DavidnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Differt v. RendahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rieman v. JoubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Cantor v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Rieman v. JoubertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API