Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 2017No. A16-1323PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REILLY, Judge
The 2012 judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage awarded wife, the parties’ marital homestead and required her to hold husband harmless for homestead-related expenses. Wife did not hold husband harmless regarding those expenses, and in 2014 the district court ordered wife to sell the home. When wife failed to do so, in 2016 the district court allowed husband to take possession of the home and ordered him to sell it. Wife appeals the 2016 order. Because the 2014 order affects the 2016 order, and because neither party served written notice of filing' of the 2014 order, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Dobrin v. DobrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Geldert v. American National BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Independent Consolidated School District No. 24 v. CarlstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- In Re: RFC and RESCAP Liquidating Trust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- In re the Marriage of: David Gordon Wingad v. Janet Marie WingadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Provitas, LLC v. Quality Ingredients CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023