Legal Opinion
Filister v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 31, 1964No. 39530PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
Appellants seek a declaratory judgment which will free their real estate from the restrictions of a Minneapolis zoning ordinance limiting construction to single-family dwellings. The appeal is from a judgment denying them relief.
The property consists of 8% acres of unimproved land located west of Ewing Avenue and lying between the Great Northern railroad tracks on the north and West 22nd Street on the south, in the city of Minneapolis. On April 3, 1924, this and the surrounding area were zoned for one- and two-family residences. The neighborhood has been developed in compliance…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Forbes v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Barney & Carey Co. v. Town of MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- O'BRIEN v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Westling v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Westling v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Castle Design & Development Co. v. City of Lake ElmoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.