Legal Opinion

Westling v. City of St. Louis Park

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 15, 1969No. 40973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Plaintiffs are real estate developers who appeal from a judgment denying them a special permit to construct an apartment building in the city of St. Louis Park. Upon plaintiffs’ petition for a writ of mandamus involving the same litigation, we held that they were not entitled to a settled case. Consequently the only issue for review is whether or not the findings of fact support the conclusions of law. We hold that they do.

The court’s findings may be summarized as follows: In 1944, plaintiffs acquired 40 acres of farmland which from 1947 to 1962 they developed into 64…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Olsen v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Ostrand v. Village of North St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Filister v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Golden v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Inland Construction Co. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. O'BRIEN v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Holasek v. Village of MedinaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Chandler v. KroissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Kismet Investors, Inc. v. County of BentonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API