Legal Opinion

Smith v. Howard

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1958No. Civ. 22742PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This is an action for damages in three counts. The plaintiffs are: (1) a prospective purchaser of real property—Bernard Smith; and (2) a real estate broker—Vincent Reeves. There are several defendants, the principal of whom is Jack Howard, a real estate broker.

The first cause of action is stated by both plaintiffs. This cause of action claims damages arising from the breach of an alleged agency relationship between plaintiffs and defendant Howard, and damages arising out of a conspiracy among all defendants.

The second action is stated only by plaintiff Smith. It repeats the allegations of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Hamilton v. AbadjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Langford v. IssenhuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Skopp v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Montoya v. McLeodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Hale v. WolfsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Ellis v. HollisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API