Legal Opinion

Skopp v. Weaver

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1976No. L.A. 30372PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint alleges that defendants, who are real estate brokers and salesmen, 1 were plaintiffs’ agents to facilitate the sale of plaintiffs’ property. Plaintiffs allege that defendants breached their duty as agents by not revealing to plaintiffs that plaintiffs’ land had been sold to the state for taxes; defendants then arranged to terminate the period of redemption and acquire for themselves the property for a fraction of its true value. These allegations, plaintiffs maintain, state a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty.

Defendants’…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Gentry v. eBay, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Kiseskey v. Carpenters' Trust for Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API