Legal Opinion

Langford v. Issenhuth

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1912PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Spink County, Hon. Alva E. Taylor, Judge. Action by George W. Langford against John Issenhuth. Judgment for plaintiff, "and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appeal from the circuit court of Spink county. Action for commissions. Jury trial. Verdict for plaintiff upon which judgment was entered. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order overruling his motion for a new trial. The complaint alleges that plaintiff is a real estate broker engaged in the business of selling and exchanging lands and stocks, with *453his principal place of business at Aberdeen; that about the 17th of June, 1909, defendant listed with him for sale or trade certain personal and real property at Northville, Iowa; that defendant agreed in case plaintiff would find a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Johnson v. BurnsideSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Strom v. Montana Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Montross v. EddyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Suter v. PageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hurney v. LockeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Waller v. SloanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Forthofer v. ArnoldOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API