Normile v. Denison
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered April 10, 1919, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to recover a community interest in property.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This action was brought by appellant against respondent, individually and as executrix of the estate of S. Normile, deceased, to recover one-half of certain community property accumulated by the decedent and appellant during the time they were husband and wife, which, it is alleged, was, at the time of the making of a property settlement between them, fraudulently concealed by the husband.
To appellant’s supplemental and amended complaint, a demurrer was interposed on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moor v. MoorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Berrendo Irrigated Farms Co. v. JacobsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
- Daniel v. GliddenWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Hofflin v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Mulholland v. Washington Match Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kilbourne v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Sears v. RusdenWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Bullock v. BullockWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Normile v. DenisonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Brown v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.