Daniel v. Glidden
Washington Supreme Court
'Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King' county, Griffin, J., entered March 19, 1901, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court ■without a jury, in an action on a promissory note.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
This suit was brought to recover of the defendants, Buttner and Glidden, for an alleged personal liability upon a written instrument, of which the following is a copy:
*558“German American Investment O'o-. Inc. No; 409.
“$600.00 Seattle, Wash., Feb. 8, 1902.
“Received from Herman Daniel $.600
“Six Hundred . Dollars
which we promise to pay six (6) months after date with interest at the rate of eight (8) per cent per annum.
“H. M. Glidden, Secy. Wm. H. Buttner, President.”
Inasmuch as the sufficiency of the complaint is attacked, we shall set forth somewhat fully the averments thereof. It is alleged that,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Washington Central Improvement Co. v. NewlandsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Sherman v. SweenyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Griffith v. StrandWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Walsh v. BushellWashington Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Austin, Nichols Co., Inc. v. GrossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Gray v. ReevesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Toon v. McCawWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Puget Sound National Bank v. SelivanoffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Hansen v. LindellWashington Supreme Court · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.