Bullock v. Bullock
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Appellant complains in her action of alleged fraud of respondents in inducing her to enter into a settlement of property rights between herself and respondent Bullock. She complains that she did not receive half of the community property in a property settlement preceding a divorce. It is alleged that respondents were intimately and closely associated together in business transactions and that respondent Kelleher had a large amount of personal property owned by the community, the Bullocks, standing in his name and in his possession; that the character and extent of such property was unknown…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peyton v. PeytonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Schultz v. ChristopherWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Hicks v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Loeper v. LoeperWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Normile v. DenisonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Garrity's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- United Benefit Life Insurance v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Berman v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re the Marriage of OlsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Sears v. RusdenWashington Supreme Court · 1951