Legal Opinion

Normile v. Denison

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1921No. 16435PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Wilmon Tucker, judge pro tempore, entered November 29,1920, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action to recover a community interest in property.

1Per curiam

The law of this case was practically settled in nearly all respects in a former appeal, reported in 109 Wash. 205, 186 Pac. 305. Upon the going down of the remittitur on the former appeal, issues were settled by the filing of an answer containing denials and affirmative allegations, and an appropriate reply thereto.

At the trial the evidence on behalf of the appellant practically followed the allegations of the amended and supplemental complaint, which we held in the former appeal stated a cause of action, and there was very little contradiction of such evidence.

On behalf of respondent it was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Clifford v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. O'Connor v. SlatterWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Averbuch v. AverbuchWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Normile v. DenisonWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kilbourne v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Sears v. RusdenWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Bullock v. BullockWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Brown v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API