Legal Opinion

Sears v. Rusden

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1951No. 31520PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Plaintiff, the former wife of defendant, brought this action upon the theory that she had been defrauded of her interest in certain properties at the time the parties entered into a property settlement agreement.

The parties were married in 1927. Until 1940, both were employed. In 1940, they entered into business for themselves, owning and operating the Olive Way Triple XXX Barrel in Seattle. During the next five years, they acquired similar business interests; their financial successes were most substantial. For about four years, plaintiff worked actively in the various businesses and had a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ambrose v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Farley v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Philbrick v. AndrewsWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Thompson v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of MahalingamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Olsen v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Tonga Air Services, Ltd. v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Pittman v. PittmanWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Anderson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API