Coghlan v. Miller
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOURT, J.
This is an action for damages for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appeals.
Defendant instituted a criminal prosecution against the plaintiff and John A. Glatt by a criminal information, sworn to by defendant before T. F. Hayes, Justice of the Peace, at Woodburn, Oregon, in the following form:
“Gomes now Nicholas Miller who being first duly sworn, says that Charles Coghlan and John A. Glatt are guilty of the crime of assault upon another with a dangerous weapon committed as follows:
That said Charles Coghlan and John A. Glatt on the 17th day of June, 1919 in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. GodfreyOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Power v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Stamper v. RaymondOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Smith v. ReederOregon Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paullus v. YARBROUGH ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. LaurelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. LaurelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970