Powers v. Harlow
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. (Grant, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.
Action on the case to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant’s servant.
The material facts are the following:. For many years the defendant has been owner of a farm near the city of Marquette, which has been under the general fhanagement of one Hodgson, his foreman or superintendent, who has leased small parcels to laboring men for cultivation. Upon these parcels potatoes and other vegetables have been raised, and the ground has been cultivated by the lessees with the assistance of their wives and children. In the year 1883 the farm was divided…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hargreaves v. DeaconMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Kefee v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- City of Pekin v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Forge v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.