Legal Opinion

Paullus v. YARBROUGH ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1959PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is a suit in equity brought by the buyer named in a timber contract to enjoin the sellers from preventing the buyer from continuing logging operations in accordance with the terms of the contract. The plaintiff also seeks to recover $9,120 damages alleged to have resulted from defendants’ interference with plaintiff’s logging operations.

The trial court entered a decree enjoining the defendants from preventing the plaintiff from going upon the defendants’ land for the purpose of cutting and removing the poles and logs thereon in accordance with the terms of the contract. The prayer for…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Seguin v. Maloney-Chambers Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Davis v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Elmonte Investment Co. v. Schafer Bros. Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Palmer v. WahlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Temple Enterprises, Inc. v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1940

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Van v. FoxOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Boling v. NorkOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. George L. Jantzer Et At. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API