Legal Opinion

State v. Laurel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

The defendant, Peter Laurel, was convicted pursuant to ORS 163.250 of assault with a dangerous weapon, received a two-year suspended sentence and was placed on two years’ probation. From this conviction he appeals, assigning as sole error the circuit court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal.

Four men — the defendant, Gulledge, Wilburn and Thomas — jointly occupied a piece of property in the Takilma area of the Hlinois Valley in Josephine County, Oregon. Thomas held its legal title, although he and Wilburn in fact owned the property together. Located on the land was a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. BartmessOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. TrentOregon Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. ButterfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  4. State v. LaurelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API