Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Normet

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1972No. 70-5045PublishedCited by 870 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

This case presents the question of whether Oregon’s judicial procedure for eviction of tenants after nonpayment of rent violates either the Equal Protection Clause or the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The material facts were stipulated. Appellants were the month-to-month tenants of appellee Normet1 and paid $100 a month for the use of a single-family residence in Portland, Oregon. On November 10, 1969, the City Bureau of Buildings declared the dwelling unfit for habitation due to substandard conditions on the premises.2 Appellants requested appellee to make certain repairs…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by870 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

865 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API