Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1971No. 7126DC50PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the court committed error in setting aside the default judgment entered on 14 September 1970. In the motion of the defendant to set aside the judgment, it is alleged that it was based upon an unverified complaint and did not comply with G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11 (c) and G.S. 1-75.11.

Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11(a), it is not necessary that pleadings be verified or accompanied by an affidavit unless otherwise specifically provided by the rules or by statute. Defendant appellee contends that the provisions of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 11(c) require verification of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrell v. . WelsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Wellons v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Brown v. Refuel America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Lemon v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Asheville Sports Properties, LLC v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Sheffer v. RardinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Miller v. BelkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API