Legal Opinion
Superior Strut & Hanger Co. v. Port of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 1977No. Civ. 39294PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EMERSON, J. *
The California Relocation Assistance Law, Government Code section 7260 et seq., (hereafter CRAL or the Act) provides in substance that a public entity which acquires real property for public use shall compensate a displaced person for relocation expenses and certain other losses. (Gov. Code, § 7262.) 1
Respondent Superior Strut & Hanger Co., claiming to be a displaced person as defined in section 7260, subdivision (c), recovered judgment against appellant Port of Oakland (hereafter the Port). The judgment awarded relocation costs and also attorneys’ fees. The Port appeals.
Pr…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Unida v. VolpeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- California Coastal Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Melamed v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Owens v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Richmond Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.