Legal Opinion
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Richmond Redevelopment Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 1986No. A019474PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate which directed it to find plaintiff to be a displaced person within the meaning of Government Code section 7260, subdivision (c) 1 and to determine the amount of relocation benefits to which plaintiff is entitled under section 7262.
In September 1977, the Richmond Redevelopment Agency (Agency) purchased approximately 362 acres, some of it submerged, from Santa Fe Land and Development (Santa Fe). At the time plaintiff occupied some 64 acres of the property under a lease from Santa Fe. Plaintiff had used the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Pasadena v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Topanga Beach Renters Ass'n v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Superior Strut & Hanger Co. v. Port of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Concrete Service Co. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Court of Appeal · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Bristol v. Ocean State Job Lot Stores of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Kaufman v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- In Re Best Products Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Kirk Corp. v. First American Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.